Rushkoff on distributionism

Douglas Rushkoff at Platform Cooperativism November 2015

Distributists believe property ownership is a fundamental right and that the means of production should be spread as widely as possible. Otherwise we’re faced with centralization by the state, by the few (a plutocracy, the 1%), or corporations (corporatocracy). I’ve understood the concept for some time, but I’ve only just learned from Douglas Rushkoff that it originated in the Catholic church. No idea how I missed that!

In my opinion, Rushkoff‘s contribution to the Platform Cooperativism conference last week exemplified the core concerns of delegates, and more eloquently than many of us might muster. Platform Cooperativism is distributist, striving to counter the centralizing platform monopolies we’ve seen prevail in recent years, and for anyone familiar with the hi:project’s mission and vision you’ll know we’re intent on facilitating personal agency and distributed participation, so our respective values and aspirations have much in common.

He spoke for just over 40 mins (starting 4 mins into the embedded video below), and here’s how he concludes:

The beauty is that, in the real world, as opposed to online, in the real world, human beings have the homefield advantage. We actually do. This is why corporations of the industrial era are so happy to go online because we no longer have the advantage there. We’re not there. We don’t have our flesh, our reality, we don’t have all the stuff, all the solidarity that is created by humans in real space together. So I believe our opportunity, as humans, who want to redirect the economy towards human ends rather than the needs of extractive capital that’s serving nobody is to reboot the economy itself for distributed prosperity.

Mr. Rushkoff, if you’re reading this, we’d love to have a deep and meaningful. We think you might just love the human interface project.

Douglas Rushkoff speaking at Platform Cooperativism, New School, New York, 13-14th Nov 2015

[This video embed from livestream doesn’t always want to play it seems. If it’s not working for you, you can view it here.]

What do you think? (Please note that we moderate comments to keep quality up. We always accept comments made politely, in good faith, and preferably quoting references in support of any assertions. The use of disposable email addresses in this context tells us you consider your contribution disposable too.)